Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2012 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- IOL1
- OT1
- QB1
- RB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Indiana (2012).
2012 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2012 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2012 recruiting class for Indiana showcased a notable development trajectory, particularly with the emergence of several players who significantly exceeded their initial recruiting rankings. The class, originally ranked 55th, saw a substantial improvement in the S2S rerank, moving up to 23. The success of the class can largely be attributed to the contributions of lower-ranked recruits such as Tevin Coleman, Dan Feeney, and Jason Spriggs, all of whom turned into NFL starters despite entering the program with lower expectations.
Conversely, the class included several highly ranked recruits who did not perform to the level anticipated. Players like Cameron Coffman, Antonio Marshall, Jacarri Alexander, and Ryan Thompson were expected to make a more substantial impact based on their high school rankings, but they ultimately fell short of expectations. This disparity in outcomes suggests a mixed outcome where the program effectively developed lower-ranked talent while struggling to maximize the potential of its higher-ranked recruits.
Overall, the 2012 class for Indiana outperformed expectations, particularly through the development of several recruits who became impactful players, such as NFL starters. The S2S rerank increased significantly, reflecting the program's ability to elevate lower-ranked talent to a higher performance level. However, the class also featured notable misses among its higher-ranked prospects, indicating a need for improvement in talent assessment and development at the upper echelon of recruiting. The key takeaway from this recruiting class is that successful outcomes can emerge from unexpected places, but consistent performance from high-ranking recruits remains critical for overall success.