Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- K1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Georgia Tech (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Georgia Tech saw a range of outcomes that reflect the challenges of player development within the program. Overall, the class had a total of 15 commits, with a blue chip percentage of just 7%, indicating a reliance on lower-rated recruits. The S2S rerank dropping from 67 to 101 suggests that the performance of the recruits did not meet initial expectations, particularly for those who were highly ranked.
In terms of individual outcomes, several players emerged as contributors and college starters, which is noteworthy given the overall ranking of the class. Players like Shamire DeVine, Ricky Jeune, and Paul Davis each achieved a college starter status, showcasing reasonable development from their original rankings. However, the presence of multiple recruits labeled as "Bust" indicates that not all recruits were able to fulfill their potential, particularly those who were ranked higher, such as Travis Custis.
The overall outcomes of the 2013 recruiting class for Georgia Tech can be characterized as underperforming relative to original expectations. The drop in S2S ranking illustrates that the recruits did not significantly materialize into the anticipated impact players. While there were some positive developments, including a notable hit with Harrison Butker, the presence of several busts highlights the challenges faced in maximizing the potential of this class.
In summary, the 2013 recruiting class for Georgia Tech did not meet expectations, with a clear need for improved development strategies moving forward.