Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB2
- DE1
- LB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Florida State (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Florida State 2013 recruiting class presents an interesting case of mixed outcomes against their initial recruiting rankings. With a class originally ranked 12th, expectations were relatively high; however, the S2S rerank to 26 indicates a significant decline in perceived value post-recruitment. This drop suggests that while the class had a solid blue chip percentage of 59, the overall performance did not align with the initial expectations.
Among the notable successes, Marquez White stands out as a Hit, demonstrating that even lower-ranked recruits can exceed expectations significantly. However, the class also experienced a high number of misses, particularly among higher-ranked players like Ira Denson, Isaiah Jones, and Keith Bryant, each of whom was expected to contribute more significantly than they ultimately did. This pattern emphasizes the volatility and unpredictability of recruiting outcomes, especially for players ranked within the top 100.
Overall, the Florida State 2013 recruiting class underperformed relative to its original expectations. The significant drop in the S2S rerank reflects a reality where several highly-ranked recruits failed to meet their anticipated contributions. The presence of both Hits and a substantial number of Misses illustrates the unpredictable nature of recruiting success, where high expectations do not always translate into on-field performance. In summary, this class serves as a reminder of the challenges in projecting player success based solely on recruiting rankings.