Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- DT1
- QB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Colorado (2015).
2015 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Steady development, low risk.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2015 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2015 recruiting class for Colorado displayed a mix of outcomes that reflect both successes and shortcomings. With an original class rank of 66, expectations were tempered. However, the class demonstrated a notable improvement in the S2S rerank to 28, indicating that the program's development strategies may have positively influenced player performance over time.
Among the recruits, several players emerged as significant contributors, particularly those who were originally unranked or low-ranked. For instance, Afolabi Laguda and Brett Tonz both became college starters, surpassing initial expectations and validating the coaching staff's ability to develop talent. This trend underscores a broader pattern in recruiting classes where the success rate for lower-ranked recruits can sometimes be higher than their higher-ranked counterparts.
Conversely, the class also featured a couple of notable misses. Aaron Baltazar and Blake Robbins, both of whom were originally ranked, did not deliver outcomes commensurate with their rankings, reflecting a disconnect between recruitment expectations and actual performance on the field. This serves as a reminder that while rankings can provide insight into potential, they do not always guarantee success at the collegiate level.
Overall, the Colorado 2015 recruiting class met expectations, especially in terms of development and performance of lower-ranked recruits. The S2S rerank moving up significantly suggests that the coaching staff effectively cultivated talent, even among those initially considered less likely to succeed. The presence of several college starters from this class further illustrates a successful developmental approach, although the misses indicate areas for improvement in future recruiting efforts. In summary, the class demonstrated a solid ability to exceed expectations, particularly with lower-ranked players.