Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Colorado (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Colorado 2014 recruiting class displayed a mixture of outcomes that suggest a challenging developmental environment. The overall class was originally ranked 74th and slightly improved to a 79th ranking after evaluation, indicating minimal progression in terms of talent development. With no blue-chip recruits in the class, the expectations were tempered, and the outcomes reflected this reality.
Among the 24 recruits, there were several contributors and college starters, showcasing a capacity to identify and develop talent in lower-ranked categories. The presence of players like Leo Jackson, who became a college starter despite being unranked, highlights a success in player development. However, the class also included notable misses, such as Cade Apsay, who was expected to contribute significantly as a quarterback but ultimately fell short.
This class demonstrates a common trend where lower-ranked prospects can exceed expectations while higher-ranked recruits may not meet their anticipated impact. Colorado's ability to develop talent from the lower tiers is a positive aspect, even as the overall class performance remained mixed.
Overall, the Colorado 2014 recruiting class met expectations considering its ranking and the overall context of its recruits. The S2S rerank remained relatively stable, indicating that while there were some success stories, the class did not produce standout performers relative to its original rankings. The outcomes suggest that while there was some successful development, particularly with unranked players, there were also significant setbacks among the higher-ranked recruits.
In summary, this class serves as a reminder of the unpredictability of recruiting outcomes and the importance of player development in maximizing potential.