Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- RB1
- S1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Colorado (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Steady development, low risk.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Colorado Buffaloes' 2013 recruiting class showcased a remarkable turnaround in production relative to their original rankings. With a class initially ranked 68th, the subsequent S2S rerank to 17th indicates a significant improvement in player performance as measured by outcomes. This class produced several players who exceeded expectations, particularly with three recruits achieving outcomes that positioned them as NFL starters.
Despite a low blue-chip percentage of 5%, the class demonstrated a capacity for development, particularly among lower-ranked recruits. The outcomes of recruits like Phillip Lindsay, Tedric Thompson, and Chidobe Awuzie illustrate the program's ability to cultivate talent, leading to outcomes that align with or surpass expectations. The presence of multiple players achieving high outcomes, such as NFL starter status, underscores the effectiveness of player development within the program.
Conversely, while there were standout performances, there were also disappointments. Jimmie Gilbert, who had an All American outcome, did not fully meet the expectations based on his original ranking. Such mixed results highlight the variability in recruiting success, where high expectations do not always correlate with performance.
Overall, the Colorado 2013 recruiting class outperformed expectations, particularly in developing lower-ranked recruits into impactful players. The S2S rerank improved significantly due to the emergence of key contributors and starters, indicating effective development strategies at the program level. This class serves as a strong example of how talent evaluation and coaching can lead to positive outcomes, even when initial rankings suggest limited potential.