Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LB1
- S1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Cincinnati (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Cincinnati Bearcats' 2016 recruiting class experienced a mix of developmental outcomes, demonstrating a notable trend of exceeding expectations among lower-ranked recruits. The class, ranked 108th originally, saw an improvement to 66th in the S2S re-rank, indicating significant growth among some players who developed into key contributors and starters by the end of their college careers.
Notably, recruits like Curtis Brooks and Gerrid Doaks emerged as All Conference players, highlighting the program's ability to cultivate talent from lower-ranked positions. While the overall class rating was low, the presence of several contributors, such as Bruno Labelle and Malick Mbodj, also reflects a positive trend in player development. However, several higher-ranked recruits, such as Devin Gray and Elijah Ponder, failed to meet expectations, indicating variability in performance relative to their recruitment status.
Overall, the Cincinnati 2016 recruiting class met expectations when considering the S2S rerank and the outcomes of the recruits. While a few higher-ranked players did not significantly develop, the success of several lower-ranked recruits balanced the class's performance. The movement of the S2S ranking upward suggests effective development practices within the program. This class serves as a reminder that player potential can often surpass initial recruiting assessments, particularly for those who were overlooked or undervalued.