Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT1
- RB1
- S1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Cincinnati (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Cincinnati 2014 recruiting class, ranked 70th overall, produced a varied range of outcomes among its 25 recruits. The class showcased a mix of low-ranked recruits who exceeded expectations and higher-ranked players who failed to produce at anticipated levels. Notably, Kimoni Fitz and Cortez Broughton emerged as significant contributors, with Fitz achieving an All Conference status and Broughton being drafted into the NFL, indicating effective development and utilization of talent from lower expectations.
Conversely, the class also included several misses, particularly among higher-ranked recruits. Hakeem Allonce, who was originally ranked 116, did not progress as expected, resulting in a Bust outcome. Similarly, Casey Gladney, ranked 53rd, only managed to be a Contributor, indicating that despite a higher initial ranking, he did not fulfill the potential typically associated with such positions. This contrast highlights a potential area for improvement in recruitment strategy, particularly in maximizing the performance of higher-ranked players.
Overall, the Cincinnati 2014 recruiting class met expectations. While the S2S rerank remained consistent, the presence of multiple hits, including two players who achieved notable outcomes, suggests a level of success in development. The class demonstrated that lower-ranked recruits can significantly contribute, while a few higher-ranked recruits did not perform to their potential. The takeaway from this class is that while there were successes, there remains room for improvement in developing higher-ranked talent.