Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- CB1
- S1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for BYU (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for BYU yielded a mix of outcomes that reflect a moderate success in player development. With a total of 31 recruits, the class maintained a blue chip percentage of only 3%, indicating a reliance on lower-ranked prospects. Despite the low blue chip percentage, the program managed to produce several college starters, which is noteworthy given the overall expectations set by the original rankings.
The outcomes of this class, particularly the successful development of multiple players into college starters, suggest a positive coaching and player development environment within the program. The S2S rerank moving slightly down from 69 to 70 indicates a reevaluation of the class based on performance metrics, rather than a definitive failure. The presence of several contributors and college starters reflects a solid return on investment for the coaching staff's recruitment efforts, particularly with a significant number of lower-ranked players contributing meaningfully on the field.
Overall, the 2013 recruiting class for BYU met expectations, particularly given the lower rankings of many recruits involved. The ability to develop multiple players into college starters is a clear indicator of effective coaching and player development strategies. The slight drop in the S2S rerank could be attributed to the inability of higher-ranked recruits to significantly impact the team, but the successful outcomes of lower-ranked players balance this assessment. In conclusion, while the class did not feature standout elite talent, it showcased BYU’s capacity to nurture and develop its recruits effectively.