Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- IOL1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Bowling Green (2013).
2013 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2013 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The 2013 recruiting class for Bowling Green demonstrated a mix of notable hits and some disappointing misses, reflecting a range of outcomes that align with their original expectations. The class overall saw several unranked and lower-ranked players rise to earn All Conference honors, indicating that player development within the program may have been effective. Notably, four players who were originally unranked or ranked lower than 2000 achieved the highest outcome of All Conference, suggesting that Bowling Green has a solid track record of cultivating talent regardless of initial rankings.
Conversely, some higher-ranked recruits did not meet expectations, with Coppet and Holiday exemplifying the challenges that can arise from recruiting. While Coppet was expected to be a key player given his ranking, his outcome of a College Starter suggests that he did not reach the anticipated impact level. Similarly, Holiday's designation as a Bust underscores the unpredictability inherent in recruiting, especially for higher-ranked prospects who may not pan out as hoped.
Overall, the 2013 recruiting class for Bowling Green met expectations, showcasing a balanced outcome profile. The significant rerank from 86 to 76 suggests that the program's development efforts were effective in maximizing the potential of lower-ranked players. The presence of multiple All Conference honors among lower-ranked recruits further supports this assessment. In conclusion, while the class had notable hits, the performance of some higher-ranked recruits highlights the complexities of evaluating recruiting success.