Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT1
- S1
- Unknown1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Baylor (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
Baylor's 2016 recruiting class showcased a mix of outcomes that reflected both success and missed opportunities. With a total of 16 recruits, the class was originally ranked 30th but dropped to 38th upon reevaluation. This decline suggests that while some recruits developed well, others failed to meet the expectations set during their recruitment. The blue chip percentage of 25 indicates a modest level of high-profile talent, but the overall performance indicates that the program's ability to develop these players did not fully align with their initial rankings.
The class produced noteworthy hits such as Denzel Mims and Bravvion Roy, both of whom emerged as NFL starters, highlighting Baylor's capacity to cultivate talent from lower-ranked recruits. However, the presence of busts like Jeremy Faulk and Thomas Cletcher—who were highly ranked yet underperformed—illustrates the volatility in recruiting success. Furthermore, contributors such as Chris Miller, Jared Atkinson, and others show that while not every player reached elite status, several provided value to the team.
Overall, Baylor's 2016 recruiting class met expectations in some areas but underperformed in others. The S2S rerank moving down indicates that while key players emerged as starters, the failure of higher-ranked recruits to contribute significantly impacted the class's overall standing. The mixed outcomes demonstrate that while there were bright spots, the class did not fully capitalize on its potential, showing the challenges inherent in predicting player development based on recruiting rankings alone.
Takeaway: The 2016 recruiting class for Baylor yielded a combination of significant successes and disappointing outcomes, with notable players emerging while others fell short of expectations.