Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT3
- IOL1
- LB1
- RB1
- WR1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Auburn (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Auburn 2014 recruiting class displayed a blend of results that reflected both successful and underwhelming outcomes. With a total of 23 commits, including a 61% blue chip percentage, the class originally ranked 6th nationally but fell to a S2S rerank of 22. This significant drop indicates a collective performance that did not meet the initial recruitment expectations for the program.
Among the recruits, there were notable hits and misses. Kamryn Pettway, a lowly ranked recruit, achieved an All Conference designation, demonstrating that even lower-ranked players can exceed expectations and contribute significantly to the team. Conversely, several highly ranked players like D'haquille Williams and DaVonte Lambert failed to demonstrate the level of performance anticipated from their elite recruitment status, resulting in outcomes that did not align with their original rankings.
The overall pattern suggests that while Auburn secured a class with considerable talent, the inability of several top recruits to transition into impactful players contributed to the class's underwhelming re-rank. The mixture of outcomes illustrates the complexities and unpredictability of player development in college football.
The Auburn 2014 recruiting class ultimately underperformed in relation to its original expectations, as evidenced by the drop in S2S ranking. While there were standout contributors, the failure of several highly ranked recruits to live up to their potential significantly impacted the overall evaluation of the class. The S2S rerank decreased due to the combination of high-profile misses and the general struggle of many recruits to fulfill their projected roles. In summary, this recruiting class showcased potential but did not achieve the level of success anticipated based on initial evaluations.