Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2011 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Army (2011).
2011 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2011 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
No recruits from this era reached the NFL.
The Army 2011 recruiting class featured a total of 25 recruits, with an original class rank of 78, which indicates a lower-tier recruiting class. However, it is notable that the class experienced a downward adjustment in the S2S rerank to 111, indicating that the expectations set during the recruiting process were not met in terms of overall player development and performance.
In terms of outcomes, the class produced multiple players who became college starters, with eight recruits achieving an outcome score of 2, labeled as "College Starter." Additionally, Matt Semelsberger emerged as a standout, achieving an "All Conference" designation, which reflects positively on the program's ability to develop talent, even among unranked recruits. However, the overall lack of higher-ranked recruits who significantly outperformed their expectations suggests that this class struggled to meet the potential typically associated with a recruiting class of its size.
Overall, the Army 2011 recruiting class underperformed relative to expectations. The significant drop in S2S ranking reflects a struggle to translate recruiting potential into on-field performance. While the emergence of a few notable players like Semelsberger highlights positive development, the absence of blue chip recruits and the high number of players with lower outcomes contributed to an overall disappointing assessment of the class. In summary, while there were some successes, the majority of the class did not fulfill the expectations set during the recruiting process.