Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- LB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Arkansas State (2016).
2016 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2016 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Arkansas State 2016 recruiting class demonstrated notable development patterns, particularly in the transition from original ranking to performance outcomes. The S2S rerank of 42 indicates a significant improvement in perceived talent and potential as compared to the original class ranking of 78. This suggests that the coaching staff effectively developed and utilized their recruits, leading to a higher number of contributors and starters than initially anticipated.
Among the recruits, the presence of several players who achieved All Conference honors signifies successful talent identification and development. For instance, BJ Edmonds, who was originally ranked low, emerged as a standout performer. This highlights a trend where lower-ranked recruits exceeded expectations, contributing positively to the overall team performance.
Conversely, the presence of several ranked recruits who underperformed, such as Kendall Sanders and Antwon Turnage, indicates that not all expectations were met. This underscores the variability in recruiting success, where even higher-ranked recruits can occasionally fail to reach their projected potential. Overall, the class's ability to produce All Conference players while also featuring contributors reflects a balanced outcome.
The Arkansas State 2016 recruiting class largely met expectations, demonstrating a commendable ability to develop talent, especially among lower-ranked recruits. The S2S rerank improved due to the emergence of multiple players as contributors and starters, especially those who achieved All Conference recognition. However, the presence of several ranked recruits who underperformed highlights the inherent risks in recruiting. The takeaway is that while the class showed commendable development, some higher-ranked recruits did not fulfill their potential.