Pipeline
NFL production
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
- DT1
- IOL1
- LB1
- OT1
- RB1
Program year analysis and class DNA metrics for Arizona State (2014).
2014 recruiting class — expectation versus Stars2Stats outcomes
Class medals
“Built on development, not recruiting rankings.”
S2S Class DNA
One-year metrics for this recruiting class
Recruits that contributed to program
Share who became impact players (starters, elite contributors, or NFL)
Based on only Low HS Projection → All-Conference or higher
Recruits that reached the NFL in any tier
Share with limited verified outcomes
Pipeline
Signing classes 2014 · NFL signee counts by recruit position
The Arizona State 2014 recruiting class showcased a mix of outcomes, with a total of 26 recruits contributing to the program. The class initially ranked 17th, but the S2S rerank to 29 indicates that the actual performance of this cohort did not align with the expectations set upon their recruitment. The presence of several players who achieved college starter status, such as Armand Perry, Chad Adams, and De'Chavon Hayes, demonstrates that the program was able to develop some talent, yet many recruits fell short of their initial projections.
The distribution of outcomes reflects a trend where lower-ranked recruits managed to exceed expectations, while several higher-ranked players underperformed. This inconsistency in meeting expectations is evident in the four players identified as misses, where high expectations based on original rankings resulted in low outcomes. The development patterns highlight the challenges in translating recruiting rankings into actual performance on the field.
Overall, the 2014 recruiting class for Arizona State underperformed relative to expectations. The shift from a top 20 ranking to a lower S2S position emphasizes that many of the highest-ranked recruits did not fulfill their potential, contributing to a lack of elite outcomes. The high percentage of contributors and college starters indicates some success in player development, but the class struggled to produce the impact players that were anticipated. In summary, while there were notable hits, the class largely did not meet the expectations set by its original ranking.