Skip to main content

Arizona State 2004 — Recruiting Outcomes

Class Snapshot

2004 class

Key numbers for this recruiting class

Original ranking16
S2S rerank56
Total recruits23
Blue chip %43%

Badges Earned

No class-year badges earned for this class.

S2S Class DNA

2004 class

One-year metrics for this recruiting class

Hits & Misses

Hit: Paul Fanaika (IOL) — Originally unranked. Outcome: NFL Starter. Fanaika's journey from anonymity to becoming an NFL Starter truly surpasses expectations. Hit: Michael Jones (ATH) — Originally ranked 379. Outcome: All Conference. Despite a low initial ranking, Jones made significant strides to become an All Conference player. Miss: Uriah Marshall (CB) — Originally ranked 261. Outcome: Bust. Marshall's promising start did not translate into college success, resulting in a disappointing bust. Miss: Bradis McGriff (OT) — Originally ranked 262. Outcome: Bust. Despite a solid ranking, McGriff failed to deliver on the field, ending his career as a bust.

Development Story

The 2004 Arizona State recruiting class's development story is a mixed bag. While the class was originally ranked 16th, Stars2Stats reranked it at 60, reflecting a significant gap between expectations and actual outcomes. The class had a high blue-chip percentage of 43%, indicating that the recruits were highly rated, but many failed to live up to their potential. Unranked recruits such as Paul Fanaika and ranked athletes like Michael Jones outperformed their initial expectations, making significant contributions to the team. However, higher ranked recruits such as Uriah Marshall and Bradis McGriff failed to deliver performance commensurate with their ranking.

Outcome Summary

The 2004 Arizona State recruiting class underperformed expectations. Despite a promising initial ranking, the class's rerank was considerably lower, reflecting a failure to meet its anticipated potential. The rerank moved down mainly due to high-ranked recruits not achieving their projected performance level. In conclusion, while the class had some standouts, the overall outcome was a disappointment as many recruits underperformed. This class serves as a reminder that recruiting rankings, while often accurate, are not always a guarantee of future success.
Published: January 31, 2026Read time: 2 min300 words