ReRank Breakdown: 2010 Ohio State Recruiting Class

Class Snapshot

2010 class

Key numbers for this recruiting class

Original ranking19

S2S rerank8

Total recruits19

Blue chip %42%

Badges Earned

No class-year badges earned for this class.

S2S Class DNA

2010 class

One-year metrics for this recruiting class

Hits & Misses

Hit: Carlos Hyde (RB) — Originally ranked 5. Outcome: NFL Starter. Hyde exceeded expectations significantly, transitioning from a high-ranked recruit to a key contributor in the NFL. Hit: Andrew Norwell (IOL) — Originally ranked 90. Outcome: NFL Starter. Norwell also surpassed initial projections, establishing himself as a strong performer at the professional level. Hit: Corey Brown (WR) — Originally ranked 97. Outcome: NFL Starter. Brown's progression from a ranked recruit to an NFL starter demonstrates effective development within the program. Hit: Johnathan Hankins (DT) — Originally ranked 505. Outcome: NFL Starter. Hankins' rise from a lower ranking to an impactful NFL career highlights the program's ability to develop talent effectively. Hit: Bradley Roby (CB) — Originally ranked 646. Outcome: NFL Starter. Roby's success as a starter in the NFL showcases a strong developmental trajectory from his initial recruitment. Miss: James Louis (WR) — Originally ranked 124. Outcome: Bust. Louis failed to meet expectations despite being a relatively high-ranked recruit. Miss: Jamel Turner (EDGE) — Originally ranked 301. Outcome: Bust. Turner's recruitment indicated potential that did not materialize, leading to a low outcome. Miss: T.Y. Williams (WR) — Originally ranked 349. Outcome: Bust. Williams' performance did not align with his recruiting ranking, marking him as a significant miss. Miss: Taylor Graham (QB) — Originally ranked 512. Outcome: Bust. Graham's inability to contribute as expected reflects a failure to develop from his recruited position.

Development Story

The 2010 recruiting class for Ohio State has demonstrated a notable capacity for player development, particularly among higher-ranked recruits. The program successfully transformed five players, all initially ranked within the top 100 and lower, into NFL starters. This outcome indicates a strong alignment between the program's development resources and the athletes' potential, showcasing effective coaching and training methodologies that resonate with recruits' skill sets.
In contrast, the class included several misses among the ranked recruits, with four players failing to meet their expected outcomes, all labeled as "Busts." These discrepancies highlight an area for potential improvement in talent identification and development processes. The overall shift from an original class ranking of 19 to a re-ranked position of 8 suggests a significant enhancement in the perceived quality of the recruits based on their on-field performances.

Outcome Summary

Overall, the Ohio State 2010 recruiting class significantly outperformed expectations, particularly with its ability to develop players into NFL starters despite some notable misses. The S2S rerank improved due to the high number of recruits achieving impactful outcomes, especially in the context of players who exceeded their initial rankings. The takeaway from this class is that Ohio State successfully cultivated a strong core of talent that transitioned effectively to the professional level.

Published: May 28, 2026•Read time: 3 min•468 words