Skip to main content

ReRank Breakdown: 2010 Michigan State Recruiting Class

Class Snapshot

2010 class

Key numbers for this recruiting class

Original ranking32
S2S rerank3
Total recruits22
Blue chip %23%

Badges Earned

No class-year badges earned for this class.

S2S Class DNA

2010 class

One-year metrics for this recruiting class

Hits & Misses

Hit: Le'Veon Bell (RB) — Originally ranked 1526. Outcome: NFL Pro Bowl. Despite being a lower-ranked recruit, Bell achieved the highest possible outcome, establishing himself as a top-tier player. Miss: Joe Boisture (QB) — Originally ranked 387. Outcome: Bust. Boisture failed to meet expectations set by his ranking, resulting in a significant underperformance in his collegiate career.

Development Story

The 2010 recruiting class for Michigan State, originally ranked 32nd, experienced a notable surge in its S2S rerank to 3, which highlights a substantial improvement in player development and program effectiveness. This class featured a total of 22 recruits, with a blue chip percentage of 23%, indicating a modest number of highly-rated prospects. The evaluation of individual player outcomes reveals that Michigan State successfully developed several players beyond their initial recruiting expectations.
Key outcomes include Le'Veon Bell, who, despite being ranked 1526, achieved an impressive NFL Pro Bowl designation, showcasing the program's ability to nurture talent from lower-ranked positions. Additionally, multiple players, such as William Gholston, Tony Lippett, and Darqueze Dennard, all recorded high outcomes as NFL starters, further reflecting the program's focus on player development. However, the class also had its share of disappointments, most notably with Joe Boisture, a higher-ranked recruit who did not fulfill expectations, resulting in a "Bust" label.

Outcome Summary

Overall, the Michigan State 2010 recruiting class outperformed expectations significantly. The S2S rerank moved up dramatically from the original class rank due to the successful development of lower-ranked recruits into impactful players, alongside several contributions from mid-ranked players. In summary, the 2010 class exemplifies effective recruiting and player development strategies that led to positive outcomes.

Published: May 28, 2026Read time: 2 min295 words